In a rare public clash between Texas’ top Republicans, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick harshly criticized Gov. Greg Abbott on Monday following the governor’s late-night veto of Senate Bill 3, which aimed to ban all THC products in the state. Abbott’s decision, citing constitutional concerns, derailed what Patrick called his top legislative priority and prompted a sharp rebuke from the lieutenant governor.
Abbott vetoed the bill just before the Sunday midnight deadline, stating the law would likely face prolonged legal challenges. Instead, he called for a special legislative session in July to pass stricter regulations on hemp-derived THC products rather than banning them outright. Patrick responded in a defiant press conference, accusing Abbott of misleading him and undermining months of legislative work. “Where has he been all session?” Patrick questioned, insisting he would continue pushing for a full ban on THC products.
This feud highlights a significant rift between two of Texas’ most influential GOP leaders, who have typically aligned on conservative priorities. The disagreement now sets the stage for a contentious special session with no clear resolution in sight.
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Doubles Down on Ban, Rejects Regulatory Path
During his news conference, Patrick refused to compromise, warning that Texas lacks the resources to effectively regulate more than 8,000 THC retailers. He criticized Abbott for intervening at the last minute and claimed the governor expressed no concerns about SB 3 during the legislative session. Patrick also implied that Abbott’s call for regulation could lead to de facto marijuana legalization in Texas—a move he staunchly opposes.
“This is a fight that didn’t need to be,” Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said, standing firm on a full ban. He further suggested that the Legislature might even consider repealing the 2019 law that inadvertently legalized hemp products. Despite his disappointment, Patrick denied any personal animosity toward the governor but remained adamant: “I’m not going to legalize marijuana in Texas.”
Meanwhile, Abbott’s spokesperson defended the veto, stating that while the governor shared the goal of protecting children from dangerous synthetic drugs, the bill was “legally flawed.” The statement did not directly respond to Patrick’s allegations that Abbott misled him.
Legislative Uncertainty Ahead as Pressure Mounts
The dispute now leaves Texas lawmakers in a political bind, as public opinion, industry lobbying, and party divisions converge. Recent polling shows only 34% of Texans supported banning hemp products, with 50% opposing it. Advocacy from hemp farmers, veterans, and some conservative groups also played a role in urging the veto.
Some Republican legislators saw Abbott’s veto as a new opportunity. Rep. Wes Virdell, R-Brady, welcomed the chance to revisit the legislation and address issues like packaging and synthetic substances. Others, like Rep. Mitch Little, R-Lewisville, acknowledged legal hurdles tied to a ban but expressed continued support for Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick stance.
The unresolved tension leaves lawmakers facing criticism from both sides. “Folks are mad at me for voting for SB 3 and will be mad at me for supporting the veto,” said Virdell. With the special session looming, the Legislature must now navigate between calls for full prohibition and demands for pragmatic regulation in a high-stakes battle over the future of THC policy in Texas.
